[EP-tech] Re: Editoring speed problem and Review queue option

[yurj at alfa.it (Yuri)]

Isn't better to fix the slowness? i wouldn't depend, on big projects, on 
plugins found on Bazaar if I'm not sure they're well mantained.

Il 18/12/2015 09:39, Hugo F. Alr?e ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> We have experienced speed problems when editoring on our archive 
> Organic Eprints (www.orgprints.org <http://www.orgprints.org>). We 
> have +30 editors with responsibilities for different countries and 
> projects, and some of them, but only some, experience that the system 
> is very slow when they are working with the review buffer. Search etc. 
> is not affected.
>
> I finally found out that the number of editorial rights restrictions 
> affect the speed of showing the review buffer substantially. We have 
> some 16 eprint types (yes, I know, too many, but the archive has many 
> different kinds of eprints), and one of these (conference submissions) 
> has to be handled by different editors. This means most of our 
> national editors have 15 eprint types (all but the conference 
> submissions) in their editorial rights restrictions, to avoid 
> conference submissions being moved into the archive prematurely by the 
> national editors. Some editors have a number of countries and projects 
> as well in their editorial rights restrictions, which means that 
> showing the buffer can be veeery slow (like, go get a cup of coffee, 
> start on something else, and forget about it).
>
> To solve this problem, I think about handling the conference 
> submissions differently. In the ePrints Bazaar I found the Reviewed 
> queue package, which offers a functionality that potentially can meet 
> this purpose by establishing an additional review buffer.
>
> For this to work however, eprints of type conference submissions 
> should go automatically into this additional buffer. Is this possible? 
> And if so, how?
>
> And preferably it should be possible to restrict most editors from 
> seeing this additional buffer. We have editors with different powers 
> already (some being able to modify the subject trees to e.g. add new 
> research affiliations). But I am not sure whether the additional 
> buffer established by Reviewed queue can be allocated to a specific 
> editor type. Is this possible?
>
> Can anybody help on these questions?
>
> Best regards
> Hugo Alroe
> Initiator (in 2002) of Organic Eprints and presently temporary archive 
> administrator.
>
> Email: hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com <mailto:hugo.f.alroe at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/