[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EP-tech] Review Filters

Sorry : find out the right answer here :

? the filters shown are based on the columns currently displayed in the review 
screen ?

So, if one wants more filters, he must display more field columns !!!

Best regards

Le 20/04/2016 11:20, Laurent Cloarec a ?crit :
> Hi there,
> More or less same topic : I've just discovered that, with the same user "User
> Type" (Repository Administrator), some colleagues may use more field filters to
> edit buffered items (see screen capture), and, of course, watching the
> /eprints3/perl lib/EPrints/Plugin/Screen/Review.pm, I wasn't able to figure out
> where those privileges may be defined !
> So need some help from the great experts of EPrints software !!!
> Thank you in advance for any explanation
> Best regards,
> --
> Laurent Cloarec - ing?nieur d'?tudes
> Service Commun de la Documentation - Service du Num?rique Documentaire
> Universit? Toulouse 1 Capitole
> TOULOUSE (France)
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:09:30 +0000
>> From: Matthew Brady <Matthew.Brady at usq.edu.au>
>> Subject: [EP-tech] Review Filters
>> To: "eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>> Hi All,
>> I am wanting to alter the list of fields that are included in the Filter
>> section of the Review (/cgi/users/home?screen=Review) screen for users of type
>> = 'editor'.
>> Can anyone point me to where theses are defined?
>> This is required as our users have found a problem with their previous mode of
>> operation... Editorial Tools->Search Items provided more filtering to find
>> items with a status of Under Review.
>> Uncheck the default selected Live Archive and select a type (the type isn't
>> important...),  You get a list of items that match... review one of these
>> items, and make it live, then refresh the search, and the count drops by two.
>> I have investigated, and the cache table that stores the ePrint id's for the
>> search is dropping by two as well...
>> Has anyone else found a situation like this?? I'm hoping so, just for peace of
>> mind that my system hasn't been borked for a long time :-s
>> Any and all help would be appreciated... as I haven't seen anything relating
>> to this when I went back through the archives...
>> Cheers
>> Matt