EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #08352

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats

CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.

Hi

All my apologizes for the previous post, proceeding from a too fast copy and paste.

I sent almost at same time a support request to "EPrints Services" (and Justin
experienced delays in receiving it, because of issues with mail servers) and a
post to this list, because I figured out that it was not only a problem with our
repository, but also with others repositories using "IRStats2"... And I was far
too much in hurry while posting to the list, so I didn't take time enough to
"clean" the content from its references to Southampton colleagues : sorry again
for all this.

And thank you for the "fix", but I confirm that the mail format is quite
"messy", both in the list archive and through the email client view...

Best regards
--
Laurent Cloarec
Service Commun de la Documentation - Service du Numérique Documentaire
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole



Le 23/10/2020 à 12:01, David R Newman a écrit :

Hi Laurent,

I don't know if Justin is being slow to respond so you felt driven to use the
tech list but this is not really appropriate for contacting EPrints Services.

There is a fix for the problem you report.  I have actually posted this on the
tech list recently.  I don't know if you have just joined the list or have been
on it a while.  Here is the message on the mailing list archive:

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eprints.org%2Feptech%2Fmsg08317.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C3e4ce5fb6c85406e766a08d8775715b2%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637390563194391500%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=b2CH%2Fw4NlxFUGrUbLzYuh7KphgUAePrJwX9nzeuCxzQ%3D&amp;reserved=0

However, this seems to have broken the formatting of the diff I copied and
pasted.  So it is probably best looking at this email in your email client if
you were on the mailing list back on 8th October.

Regards

David Newman