EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #07934

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

Re: [EP-tech] Adding more stages to approval workflow?

Hi all,
I finally got it working. Defining the new states in get_filters from Items.pm was missing. I think it was mentioned here, but the whole state of the system was too mixed up. 

Thanks again
Johannes


Am 23.07.19 um 16:41 schrieb Johannes Schultze via Eprints-tech:

Hi all,

thanks for your replies. I got it kind of working :)

@John: I tried adding the ids of my new status definitions to "archive",
"index", etc. in the lines of code that you mentioned and those used in
the dark_archive.

@Yuri: That line has to be considered, but, as it seems until now, seems
not to be the only place.

After the hint with the database, I tried editing the preferences field,
which surely enough corrupted the table ... BUT after resetting the
preferences field to NULL the new status checkboxes started working! By
now two of ten work, but only one of the two is configured. Which is a
state I can't explain. But the key seems to be to reset the preferences
field in the user table after a code change. Until now I only did a
reload of the archive and a restart of the webserver.

Thanks
Johannes



foreach my $f ( qw/ inbox buffer archive deletion / )

this values should not be hardcoded in code, but should stay in a config
file.

Il 23/07/19 15:59, Alan.Stiles via Eprints-tech ha scritto:

When I added a stage (5 or 6 years ago)  I overrode the default
render_items to add the new stage to
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L242&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=itaCAVoxyall5R9ownN6Chk7FbVIqG5S67ZaoiWNZy0%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L242&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=itaCAVoxyall5R9ownN6Chk7FbVIqG5S67ZaoiWNZy0%3D&amp;reserved=0>
so that it would include the new stage in determining whether to show
the option as selected or not, which could be where your issue is as
it seems to loop through the fixed list of options provided rather
than refer to the repository config for the list of possible stages?

I haven’t really looked at it again in 5 years so might be missing
something, but it’s probably a good place to start.

Alan

*From:*eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
<eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk> *On Behalf Of *John Salter via
Eprints-tech
*Sent:* 23 July 2019 14:29
*To:* eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk; Johannes Schultze
<schultze@effective-webwork.de>
*Subject:* Re: [EP-tech] Adding more stages to approval workflow?

Hi Johannes,

Glad you got the first part working.

I wonder if this is something to do with the way EPrints handles the
user preferences - one of which stores which of these check-boxes are
ticked.

I've had a quick look through the code, and can see where the default
values are getting set.

These are the most relevant pieces of the code - the $user->preference
parts:

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FDataObj%2FUser.pm%23L917-L956&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=UwvT3geDhqlJN%2B1HtrdWAodEd94xF9%2FHLPLYg9tbYzA%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FDataObj%2FUser.pm%23L917-L956&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=UwvT3geDhqlJN%2B1HtrdWAodEd94xF9%2FHLPLYg9tbYzA%3D&amp;reserved=0>

and in the screen itself:

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L118-L149&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=7aFb5p%2FGJG71LyTcZ22eM5TY%2Bu0yhAHmXQlzeDrBJlQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L118-L149&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=7aFb5p%2FGJG71LyTcZ22eM5TY%2Bu0yhAHmXQlzeDrBJlQ%3D&amp;reserved=0>

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L226-L465&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=1b8TFMMYH1eh86olWX8jQGtpNkMO8Kwmh7gCZ6cI%2Bmc%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Feprints%2Feprints%2Fblob%2F3.3%2Fperl_lib%2FEPrints%2FPlugin%2FScreen%2FItems.pm%23L226-L465&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=1b8TFMMYH1eh86olWX8jQGtpNkMO8Kwmh7gCZ6cI%2Bmc%3D&amp;reserved=0>

I cannot (at a quick look) see why the value for the new eprint_status
isn't getting saved though.

This script:
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fjesusbagpuss%2Fb96dd5520018f2ec51c4c76d40e1d9b0&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=j68hhiRGh8v1Ql%2Fa%2B%2FhIFls8xtiYEb2Oet4UbJKunQM%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fjesusbagpuss%2Fb96dd5520018f2ec51c4c76d40e1d9b0&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=j68hhiRGh8v1Ql%2Fa%2B%2FhIFls8xtiYEb2Oet4UbJKunQM%3D&amp;reserved=0>

will show you the value for a user that is saved in the database e.g.


bin/local/get_user_preference_screen_items_ep_status ARCHIVEID 1

admin (admin@example.com <mailto:admin@example.com>)

Existing user preference for 'Screen::Items/eprint_status':

$VAR1 = [

'inbox',

'1',

'buffer',

'1',

'archive',

'',

'deletion',

''

       ];

If you have multiple sessions open for a user (either different tabs
in a browser, or in different browsers/computers), then ticking it in
one session can get overwritten by loading the screen in another session).

You might also be able to see some of what's going on by using the
console in the browser e.g. ticking the box for 'Retired' makes a
request to:

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feprints.server%2Fcgi%2Fusers%2Fhome%3Fscreen%3DItems%26dataset%3Deprint%26set_show_deletion%3D1&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=ykUhmq%2FZLl6JdDYTF%2BH4ZQYCsMep5BvAZYO00gc64Sw%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feprints.server%2Fcgi%2Fusers%2Fhome%3Fscreen%3DItems%26dataset%3Deprint%26set_show_deletion%3D1&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=ykUhmq%2FZLl6JdDYTF%2BH4ZQYCsMep5BvAZYO00gc64Sw%3D&amp;reserved=0>

You could try a request to e.g.

https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feprints.server%2Fcgi%2Fusers%2Fhome%3Fscreen%3DItems%26dataset%3Deprint%26set_show_status1%3D1&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=DR5tbTI67zzrxn2GPWjMBsdSRA0ZxmvxmYGMXkoHaPQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feprints.server%2Fcgi%2Fusers%2Fhome%3Fscreen%3DItems%26dataset%3Deprint%26set_show_status1%3D1&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=DR5tbTI67zzrxn2GPWjMBsdSRA0ZxmvxmYGMXkoHaPQ%3D&amp;reserved=0>

to see if that does anything?

Sorry this isn't a definite answer - hopefully it helps get started
though.

I'll have a bit more time to take a look tomorrow if necessary.

Cheers,

John

*From:*eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
<mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
[mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Johannes
Schultze via Eprints-tech
*Sent:* 23 July 2019 13:19
*To:* eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
*Subject:* Re: [EP-tech] Adding more stages to approval workflow?

Hi Chris, hi John,

one follow up question. I got my complex net of different states
working, but I can't get the filters on the "manage deposits" page to
work. I reduced the new statuses to one for this example.



I can't check the "Status 1" checkbox. It always stays unchecked.
Having eprints in that state or not does not change anything. The same
problem occurs when I use the unedited dark_archive code from the
Bazaar. Can you give me a hint, why this might not work?

Regards,
Johannes

      Hi Chris, hi John,

      I think I got a working demo by now. I used the dark_archive
      plugin as a start, and added a second stage so ...

      inbox/buffer/... -> dark_archive -> dark_archive2

      ... is now possible. The final workflow will be more complex, but
      I think I should get it configured with this approach.

      Thanks again,
      Johannes

          Hi Chris, hi John,

          thanks a lot for your quick replies and your hints! I'll take
          a look at both solutions and let you know if I got it all to work.

          Regards,
          Johannes

              There is a different way to achieve this.

              You can add new 'eprint_status' options.

              This page: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FBuilding_a_DataSet&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=wZbT%2BsYAF%2FoJmZsFbhSjg0%2B6cmLaCLR3dfCG891mOjI%3D&amp;reserved=0
              <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FBuilding_a_DataSet&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=wZbT%2BsYAF%2FoJmZsFbhSjg0%2B6cmLaCLR3dfCG891mOjI%3D&amp;reserved=0>
              provides details of how to create a 'dark archive' - which
              is normally a different end-point for a record - so
              instead of:

              Inbox -> buffer -> archive

              You can also go:

              Inbox -> buffer -> dark_archive

              This plugin does the same:

              https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbazaar.eprints.org%2F401%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=sGhuIf3P8kEzRg8j2WuyV2raIXXKNw3JMP%2BcQxg8zBQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
              <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbazaar.eprints.org%2F401%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=sGhuIf3P8kEzRg8j2WuyV2raIXXKNw3JMP%2BcQxg8zBQ%3D&amp;reserved=0>

              What you would need to configure is

              options => [qw( inbox buffer archive deletion bufferX
              bufferY )],

              and also think about whether anyone can move e.g. from
              buffer to archive - or whether everything has to go
              through all stages.

              You may want to define more user roles - so a 'normal'
              editor can move from buffer to bufferX, but a 'super
              editor' can move from buffer to bufferX, bufferY or even
              to archive.

              You may also want to create a clone of the review screen
              that looks at bufferX and buffer explicitily.

              Chris' solution would also work, each has it's merits!

              Cheers,
              John

              *From:*eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
              <mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
              [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf
              Of *Christöpher Gutteridge via Eprints-tech
              *Sent:* 26 June 2019 12:06
              *To:* eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
              <mailto:eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>; Johannes Schultze
              <schultze@effective-webwork.de>
              <mailto:schultze@effective-webwork.de>
              *Subject:* Re: [EP-tech] Adding more stages to approval
              workflow?

              This isn't trivial but would be possible. This is me
              riffing and would need refining.

              First of all, I would add tickbox fields for levels of
              signoff. ie. signoffA and signoffB and  signoffC.

              Next I would use conditionals on the "workflow" XML file
              to modify it as follows.

              In the main <flow> section, use a <when> condition to
              split behaviour for the 3 stages of the buffer to add
              additional stages to the end IF the user has the
              appropriate parameters. At an extreme level you can write
              a plugin function that takes the user and eprint as inputs
              and returns true if they have the right to approve it at
              stage a/b/c.

              If signoffA is false and the user can approve level A on
              this EPrint, they see the levelA approve stage which has
              the signoffA tickbox on it and they can set it to true.

              If signoffA is true, but  signoffB is false and the user
              can approve level B, the see the levelB approve stage
              which has the signoffB tickbox

              Similar for signoffC.

              The validation for publishing makes "signoffC" approval a
              required field so it can't be published without signoffC
              being set.

              <flow>

                 <stage ref="type"/>

                 <stage ref="files"/>

                 <stage ref="core"/>

                 <stage ref="subjects"/>

                 <epc:choose>

                    <epc:when test="eprint_status='buffer' and !signoffA and $current_user{canSignoffA}'>

                       <stage ref="signoffA" />

                    </epc:when>

                    <epc:when test="eprint_status='buffer' and signoffA and !signoffB and $current_user{canSignoffB}'>

                       <stage ref="signoffB" />

                    </epc:when>

                    <epc:when test="eprint_status='buffer' and signoffA and signoffB and !signoffC and $current_user{canSignoffC}'>

                       <stage ref="signoffC" />

                    </epc:when>



                 </epc:choose>

                </flow>

              This is utterly untested but gives some ideas I hope.
              Documentation here:

              https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FEPrints_Control_Format&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=etsF5lnTNXbjzjnZ1%2B%2B5LST9WAhRH0G4mhl1cDVQfgk%3D&amp;reserved=0
              <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FEPrints_Control_Format&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=etsF5lnTNXbjzjnZ1%2B%2B5LST9WAhRH0G4mhl1cDVQfgk%3D&amp;reserved=0>

              https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FWorkflow_Format&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=JTfk1zatl886TF%2BTA2dreDx7XVfQp9WG9tjvraXS4no%3D&amp;reserved=0
              <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FWorkflow_Format&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=JTfk1zatl886TF%2BTA2dreDx7XVfQp9WG9tjvraXS4no%3D&amp;reserved=0>

              https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FEPScript&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=GaS7ecAxDTPYV4Nem5CTS96oBrEvs1GUsssR3y%2FqfVE%3D&amp;reserved=0
              <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2Fw%2FEPScript&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=GaS7ecAxDTPYV4Nem5CTS96oBrEvs1GUsssR3y%2FqfVE%3D&amp;reserved=0>

              It's possible to make custom EPScript functions to do more
              complex tests.

              On 26/06/2019 11:05, Johannes Schultze via Eprints-tech wrote:

                  Hi all,



                  I'm currently evaluating EPrints as a replacement for an old repository

                  (custom made). Until now everything worked fine (import of existing

                  files and metadata), and I'm now trying to get the release/approval

                  workflow configured. As far as I have read in the documentation, there

                  are four stages by default:



                  inbox -> buffer -> archive -> deletion



                  I would need some more levels (and roles) in the approval workflow.

                  Something like this:



                  inbox -> buffer1 -> buffer2 -> buffer3 -> archive -> deletion



                  Different roles in the hierarchy of the organisation should approve the

                  submitted eprint in multiple steps. Is it possible to configure such

                  behaviour in EPrints? Or can something like this only be implemented

                  with some kind of plugin?



                  Regards

                  Johannes





              --

              Christopher Gutteridge<totl@soton.ac.uk>  <mailto:totl@soton.ac.uk>

              You should read our team blog athttp://blog.soton.ac.uk/webteam/



          --

          Dipl. Inf. Johannes Schultze

          Gesellschafter / Entwicklung

          Tel. +49 40 60940857-5

          Fax. +49 40 60940857-1

          schultze@effective-webwork.de  <mailto:schultze@effective-webwork.de>

          effective WEBWORK GmbH

          Neuer Wall 18

          20354 Hamburg

          https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0  <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0>

          GF Dr. Matthias Finck

          HRB 101108 (Hamburg)

          UStId DE254169943



      --

      Dipl. Inf. Johannes Schultze

      Gesellschafter / Entwicklung

      Tel. +49 40 60940857-5

      Fax. +49 40 60940857-1

      schultze@effective-webwork.de  <mailto:schultze@effective-webwork.de>

      effective WEBWORK GmbH

      Neuer Wall 18

      20354 Hamburg

      https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0  <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0>

      GF Dr. Matthias Finck

      HRB 101108 (Hamburg)

      UStId DE254169943



--
Dipl. Inf. Johannes Schultze
Gesellschafter / Entwicklung
Tel. +49 40 60940857-5
Fax. +49 40 60940857-1
schultze@effective-webwork.de  <mailto:schultze@effective-webwork.de>
effective WEBWORK GmbH
Neuer Wall 18
20354 Hamburg
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0  <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0>
GF Dr. Matthias Finck
HRB 101108 (Hamburg)
UStId DE254169943
-- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
Scotland (SC 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated
by the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to its secondary
activity of credit broking.

*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eprints.org%2Ftech.php%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=ZCGxNH9RATAGbmkuI%2B9%2Fq7GJt0Qpc%2BszrbCB6ZhwK%2FA%3D&amp;reserved=0
*** EPrints community wiki: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=t%2BioZ1cvrMYDc2qZvlzFtbYQeQ8G9a8Xw3Udc%2FaqvVU%3D&amp;reserved=0
*** EPrints developers Forum: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.eprints.org%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=JUsK%2F7nK%2B51%2B%2FaHZGVs%2FbL%2BLVfN1Ww7M0bQlpltLBzA%3D&amp;reserved=0

*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eprints.org%2Ftech.php%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=ZCGxNH9RATAGbmkuI%2B9%2Fq7GJt0Qpc%2BszrbCB6ZhwK%2FA%3D&amp;reserved=0
*** EPrints community wiki: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.eprints.org%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=t%2BioZ1cvrMYDc2qZvlzFtbYQeQ8G9a8Xw3Udc%2FaqvVU%3D&amp;reserved=0
*** EPrints developers Forum: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.eprints.org%2F&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=JUsK%2F7nK%2B51%2B%2FaHZGVs%2FbL%2BLVfN1Ww7M0bQlpltLBzA%3D&amp;reserved=0




--
Dipl. Inf. Johannes Schultze
Gesellschafter / Entwicklung

Tel. +49 40 60940857-5
Fax. +49 40 60940857-1
schultze@effective-webwork.de
effective WEBWORK GmbH
Neuer Wall 18
20354 Hamburg
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effective-webwork.de&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ceprints-tech%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C0af22be839fe4cd5322008d710475491%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&amp;sdata=dyxU0VBAPgI6oXgc3IsaaYzRPQTkM4Ddv%2BRXddoZIDY%3D&amp;reserved=0

GF Dr. Matthias Finck
HRB 101108 (Hamburg)
UStId DE254169943