EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #04051
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- To: Eprints Tech Mailing List <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Denis Pitzalis <denis.pitzalis@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:03:45 +0100
Should we open an issue on github about this?
Denis
> On 09 Mar 2015, at 10:01, Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 09/03/15 08:48, Denis Pitzalis wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Maybe even easier would be to add a min_version and a max_version
>> variables in the plugin definition. Like in PHP CMS. So we can define:
>> $self->{min_version} = “>= 3.3.10”;
>> $self->{max_version} = “< 3.3.12”;
>>
>> so we are sure that we always install the good version of a plugin.
>>
>> We could even go further and add a dependencies like:
>> $self->{dependency} = “icon-builder>1.1.4”;
>>
>> etc
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> The downside to this approach is that plugins should remain compatible
> with all releases of EPrints (and certainly within a Version: 3.1; 3.2;
> 3.3;...)
> The changes that kill plugins are changes to API calls... and those
> shouldn't change within a version (so all function/api calls in 3.3.1
> should still work in 3.3.14 - though there may be additional
> functionality available within those calls, or via new calls)
>
> I'd be happy with
>
> $self->{min_version} = “>= 3.2”;
> $self->{max_version} = “< 3.4”;
>
> Anything else, and all Bazaar plugins automatically go "out of scope" on
> every new release, until they are tested against an install of that new
> release.
>
> --
>
> Ian Stuart.
> Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org
> Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team,
> EDINA,
> The University of Edinburgh.
>
> http://edina.ac.uk/
>
> This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh.
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: jens.vieler@id.uzh.ch
- [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Denis Pitzalis <denis.pitzalis@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Index(es):
