EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #03624

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Re: Min Resolution on date fields

Hmm,

Doesn¹t look to be anything relating to dates here - curiousŠ

Andrew

On 24/11/2014 16:41, "John Salter" <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:

>Hi Andrew,
>
>From GitHub, it looks like 'min_resolution' was removed from the 'master'
>branch:
>https://github.com/eprints/eprints/blob/master/lib/defaultcfg/cfg.d/eprint
>_fields.pl
>but was left as a remnant in the 3.3 branch (that your install will be
>based on):
>https://github.com/eprints/eprints/blob/3.3/lib/defaultcfg/cfg.d/eprint_fi
>elds.pl
>
>Further to that commit in the master branch, the metafield workflow still
>asks for a min_resolution:
>https://github.com/eprints/eprints/blob/master/lib/workflows/metafield/def
>ault.xml#L72
>
> - so neither the 3.3 /or/ the master branch are fully 'right' :o\
>
>That might explain *why* it's not working, but probably doesn't help you
>achieve what you want/need to do :o\
>I would take a look at cfg.d/field_validation.pl or
>cfg.d/eprint_validation.pl, and add a check in there for the date field
>having at least the year and month parts set.
>
>Cheers,
>John
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>[mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Andrew Beeken
>Sent: 24 November 2014 10:57
>To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>Subject: [EP-tech] Min Resolution on date fields
>
>Hello all!
>
>I¹m currently trying to change the min_resolution on the stock date field
>to be ³month² rather than ³year². I¹ve changed this in our test
>environment in the eprint_fields.pl file in cfg.d, restarted the server
>but the validation is still allowing dates with only years through. Is
>there something I¹m missing?
>
>Andrew
>
>The University of Lincoln, located in the heart of the city of Lincoln,
>has established an international reputation based on high student
>satisfaction, excellent graduate employment and world-class research.
>
>The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential.
>If you have received this email in error please notify the sender
>immediately and remove it from your system. Do not disclose the contents
>to another person or take copies.
>
>Email is not secure and may contain viruses. The University of Lincoln
>makes every effort to ensure email is sent without viruses, but cannot
>guarantee this and recommends recipients take appropriate precautions.
>
>The University may monitor email traffic data and content in accordance
>with its policies and English law. Further information can be found at:
>http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/legal.
>
>*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
>*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
>
>*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
>*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/