[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[EP-tech] Re: A small issue in REF2014 Plugin v1.2.1
Jia,
I don't think there's anything checking the "Valid until" value in the
REF plugin so I'm not sure how this was a problem for the reports.
Seb.
On 15/10/12 11:56, Tian, Jia wrote:
>
> Dear Seb,
>
> Thanks a lot for the reply.
>
> Without that field, I couldn't edit the "Valid Until" field when
> creating a new benchmark. Then I couldn't select that benchmark when
> generating a REF report because that benchmark is not in a valid
> period of time. Did I misunderstand something?
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Jia
>
> **
>
> *Jia Tian*
>
> Systems Analyst, Infrastructure, Information Services
>
> *T *Internal: 62079
>
> *T * 020 8417 2079
>
> **
>
> *Kingston University *London
>
> Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE
>
> *www.kingston.ac.uk <http://www.kingston.ac.uk>*
>
> Information in this email and any attachments are confi dential, and
> may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor
> disclosed
>
> to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to
> create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the
> use of this email.
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
> *From:*eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Sebastien
> Francois
> *Sent:* 15 October 2012 11:23
> *To:* eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> *Subject:* [EP-tech] Re: A small issue in REF2014 Plugin v1.2.1
>
> Hi Jia,
>
> The field doesn't do anything hence I commented it out.
>
> Kind regards,
> Seb.
>
> On 12/10/12 10:46, Tian, Jia wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am not sure if someone already starts testing this new version
> and noticed this issue. I just sent this email to remind who is
> going to use this version.
>
> The "Valid Until" field is missing in the workflow of ref
> benchmark in the frontend. When checking the file
> "/opt/eprints3/lib/workflows/ref_benchmark/default.xml", I found
> the "end_date" line commented out like below.
>
> **
>
> <stage name="main">
>
> <component><field ref="title" /></component>
>
> <component><field ref="description" /></component>
>
> <!-- <component><field ref="end_date" /></component> -- >
>
> </stage>
>
> **
>
> Not sure whether this is a typo or now, but without this field, I
> couldn't edit the REF Benchmark from the frontend. Thus, I just
> removed the comments marks and restarted the Apache. Now the field
> is back in the frontend.
>
> *Best Wishes,*
>
> *Jia*
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Jia Tian*
>
> Systems Analyst, Infrastructure, Information Services
>
> *T *Internal: 62079
>
> *T * 020 8417 2079
>
> **
>
> *Kingston University *London
>
> Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE
>
> *www.kingston.ac.uk <http://www.kingston.ac.uk>*
>
> Information in this email and any attachments are confi dential,
> and may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee,
> nor disclosed
>
> to any third party without our permission. There is no intention
> to create any legally binding contract or other commitment through
> the use of this email.
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
>
>
> *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
>
> *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
>
> *** EPrints community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
>
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/eprints-tech/attachments/20121015/f8cc1532/attachment.html