EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #06734
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] doctype views with monograph-type and pres_type
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
 - Subject: [EP-tech] doctype views with monograph-type and pres_type
 - From: Tomasz Neugebauer <Tomasz.Neugebauer@concordia.ca>
 - Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:14:25 +0000
 
| 
 We would like to include the display/count of the sub-types for doctypes on the “View by Document Types” page: http://spectrum.concordia.ca/view/doctype/ I think that our settings are close to the EPrints defaults; we have the following “Conference or Workshop Item” types (defined as “pres_type” in eprint_fields.pl): paper, lecture, speech, poster, keynote, other.   We also have the following Monograph types (defined as “pres_type” in eprint_fields.pl): technical report, project report, documentation, manual, working paper, discussion paper, other.   Thus, on the view by doctype, we would like to see something like this: •             Article (1319) •             Book Section (100) •             Monograph (87) 
·        
technical_report ([count of technical_report]) 
·        
project_report ([count of project_report]) 
·        
documentation (count of documentation) 
·        
manual (count of manual) 
·        
working_paper (…etc…) 
·        
discussion_paper () 
·        
other () •             Conference or Workshop Item (121) 
·        
paper () 
·        
lecture () 
·        
speech () 
·        
poster () 
·        
keynote () 
·        
other () •             Book (6) •             Thesis (13040) … Has this type of view been done already?  Any advice on the best way to do that?  Is that something that can be done just by tweaking the views.pl? A related question to that is, by default, the “Book” doctype is separated out from “Monograph”, which seems counter-intuitive.  Has anyone combined these two doctypes?  Is there
 a reason to keep them separate? Best wishes, Tomasz ________________________________________________ 
Tomasz Neugebauer 
Tel. / Tél. 514-848-2424 ext. / poste 7738 
Mailing address / adresse postale: 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., LB-540-03, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8 
http://library.concordia.ca  | 
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] HTTPS part not working
 - Next by Date: [EP-tech] Enabling/disabling fields in the workflow using JS
 - Previous by thread: Re: [EP-tech] HTTPS part not working
 - Next by thread: Re: [EP-tech] doctype views with monograph-type and pres_type
 - Index(es):
 
