EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #04056

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Re: Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions

Should we say (generally) that anything we want to review/have some form of group custody over should be maintained in e.g. GitHub?

Has anyone used any CI (continuous integration) tools with Perl before?
Would anything like this: http://vincew.net/node/273; https://lumberjaph.net/jitterbug/;  help form part of a sustainable solution?

I haven't used anything like that before - but am interested in learning!

Cheers,
John

-----Original Message-----
From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ian Stuart
Sent: 09 March 2015 09:27
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions

On 09/03/15 09:25, Ian Stuart wrote:
> The tables shown are the results of those tests

Hmmm...... perhaps there should be a requirement for a test-suite, 
before a plugin can be accepted into the Bazaar?

-- 

Ian Stuart.
Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org
Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team,
EDINA,
The University of Edinburgh.

http://edina.ac.uk/

This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh.

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/