[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EP-tech] Re: Customising eprint_render.pl



Hi Adam,

Thanks for offering to help with this.  All I added to eprint_render.pl in the end was related_url, which was inserted into the summary_page_metadata as per the <comment> in summary_page.xml: 

$c->{summary_page_metadata} = [qw/
	commentary
    	note
    	keywords
	subjects
	divisions
    	related_url
	sword_depositor
	userid
	datestamp
	lastmod
/];

Field configurations?  This might be where I have gone wrong then because I don't recall making any!  :-s  But only because I thought the display of related_url was controlled by <foreach> inside summary_page.xml (i.e. only display where related_url is populated).  Have I misinterpreted this?

Thanks again!

George 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eprints-tech-bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-
> bounces at ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Field A.N.
> Sent: 10 April 2015 15:06
> To: eprints-tech at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Customising eprint_render.pl
> 
> Hi George
> 
> 	It sounds like you've done the right thing?  Can you tell me exactly how
> you made the change?  Paste bits of code into the email, and I'll be happy to
> take a look.  I'd like to see:
> 
> 		* The field configuration of your new fields
> 		* The relevant parts of eprint_render.pl
> 
> 	Cheers
> 
> --
> Adam Field
> Business Relationship Manager and Community Lead EPrints Services
> +44 (0)23 8059 8814
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8 Apr 2015, at 09:48, George Macgregor wrote:
> 
> > Hello colleagues!
> >
> > We recently migrated from 3.2.5 to 3.3.13. I am just working through a list of
> minor customisations I would like to make but I appear to have encountered a
> silly issue while modifying eprint_render.pl and summary_page.xml.
> >
> > I am attempting to modify the abstract pages as there are a couple of
> additional metadata fields I would like to display, if populated.  I therefore
> added them to eprint_render.pl, reloaded the configuration and regenerated
> the abstract pages.  The additional fields are displaying as they should, if they
> are populated (great); but where they are not populated the field is displayed
> as empty.  In summary_page.xml I notice that there appears to be a conditional
> rule to control for this.  Am I missing something obvious?  Can anyone point me
> in the right direction?  I notice similar questions being posed on this list in the
> past but with no responses.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > George
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> > George Macgregor | Information Services Directorate Curran Building |
> > University of Strathclyde
> > Tel: 0141 548 3496
> > Email: george.macgregor at strath.ac.uk
> > Web: http://personal.strath.ac.uk/george.macgregor/
> > ----------------------------------
> > The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in
> > Scotland, with registration number SC015263
> >
> >
> >
> > *** Options:
> > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> > *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> > *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> > *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
> 
> 
> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
> *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/