From: clyde.cerejo AT id.uzh.ch
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:42:29 +0100
Hi Tim Don't mean to pester, but do you have anything more on this OAI-PMH issue? Thanks Clyde ----- Weitergeleitet von Clyde Savio Cerejo/at/UZH am 15.03.2010 13:40 ----- Von: clyde.cerejo AT id.uzh.ch An: eprints-tech AT ecs.soton.ac.uk Datum: 10.03.2010 11:38 Betreff: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: OAI-PMH Bug Gesendet von: eprints-tech-bounces AT ecs.soton.ac.uk Hi Tim We have a combination search field (which searches a combination of date fields since we have different date fields for some publication types). However this refers to publication date or event end date in case of conference items. We do not have a field to search datestamp. Searching over the above mentiond combination search field with "2010-02-26-" returns items with dates after this date, eg. dates in ↵ march or may 2010. So the bug does not appear to be a general search problem. We would much appreciate a quick solution for this problem if possible, since we have our academic report using OAI-PMH to harvest our repository and this academic report is on a deadline. Thanks very much for your help. Cheers Clyde Von: Tim Brody <tdb2 AT ecs.soton.ac.uk> An: eprints-tech AT ecs.soton.ac.uk Datum: 09.03.2010 13:09 Betreff: [EP-tech] Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: OAI-PMH Bug Gesendet von: eprints-tech-bounces AT ecs.soton.ac.uk Do you have a date field in your advanced search? That's what I meant. /Tim. On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:29 +0100, clyde.cerejo AT id.uzh.ch wrote: > Hi Tim > > > Whats the parameter for searching by the datestamp. I tried using > last_modified, last-modified and datestamp. The search always returns > with "You need to specify something for atleast one field" > > > Cheers > Clyde > -----Tim Brody <tdb2 AT ecs.soton.ac.uk> schrieb: ----- > > An: clyde.cerejo AT id.uzh.ch > Von: Tim Brody <tdb2 AT ecs.soton.ac.uk> > Datum: 03/04/2010 06:13PM > Betreff: Re: Antwort: [EP-tech] OAI-PMH Bug > > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:49 +0100, clyde.cerejo AT id.uzh.ch > wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I have done some further testing. > > Using from=2010-02-26 without "until" gives results ↵ from 26, > 27 and 28 > > Feb 2010 but not from 1 or 2 March. > > Using from=2010-02-28 without "until" gives only ↵ results > from 28. > > Feb. > > Using from=2010-03-01 without "until" gives results ↵ from 1 > and 2 March > > (today). > > Using from=2010-01-30 without "until" gives results ↵ from 30 > and 31 > > January. > > > > I suspect the oai engine somehow does not know how to manage > the > > change from one month to the next. > > > > Is there a fix for this? > > Hmm. I wonder if this is OAI specific or a general search > failure. You > can do the equivalent in the search by using: > 2010-02-26- > > Does that pick up March entries? > > I will investigate more later. > > /Tim. > > > > *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech > *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ > *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ATTACHMENT: message.html!
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/